4.8 Article

Electrochemical single-cell gene-expression assay combining dielectrophoretic manipulation with secreted alkaline phosphatase reporter system

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 913-919

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2009.09.001

Keywords

Scanning electrochemical microscopy; Single-cell analysis; Reporter; Dielectrophoresis

Funding

  1. MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology), Japan [18101006, 21685008, 17066002]
  2. Center for Interdisciplinary Research, Tohoku University
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21685008, 17066002] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) was used for the analysis of single-cell gene-expression signals on the basis of a reporter system. We microfabricated a single-cell array on an Indium tin oxide (ITO) electrode comprising 4 x 4 SU-8 microwells with a diameter of 30 mu m and a depth of 25 mu m. HeLa cells transfected with plasmid vectors encoding the secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) were seeded in the microwell at a concentration of 1 cell per well by positive-dielectrophoresis (pDEP). A pDEP pulse of 3.0 Vpp and 1 MHz was applied between the microwell array/ITO electrode and an ITO counter electrode located on the top of the flow-cell assembly of the microdevice. The electrochemical responses of the individual HeLa cells transfected with SEAP were significantly larger than those of the wild-type HeLa cells. The electrochemical response of the transfected single cells was statistically distinguishable from that of wild-type HeLa cells. The size of the wells and the material of the single-cell array were optimized in order to evaluate the tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha)-induced activation process of nuclear factor kappa B (NF kappa B) that was used as the model for on-chip monitoring of cellular signal transduction. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available