4.8 Article

Comparison of surface plasmon resonance and capacitive immunosensors for cancer antigen 125 detection in human serum samples

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages 3436-3441

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2009.04.008

Keywords

Surface plasmon resonance; Capacitance; Label-free immunosensor; Cancer antigen 125

Funding

  1. Thailand Research Fund
  2. Center for Innovation in Chemistry (PERCH-CIC)
  3. Trace Analysis and Biosensor Research Center
  4. Graduate School and Faculty of Science
  5. Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a comparison between surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and capacitive immunosensors for a flow injection label-free detection of cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) in human serum. Anti-CA 125 was immobilized on gold surface through a self-assembled monolayer. Parameters affecting the responses of each system were optimized. Under optimal conditions, SPR provided a detection limit of 0.1 U ml(-1) while 0.05 U ml(-1) was obtained for the capacitive system. Linearity for SPR was between 0.1 and 40 U ml(-1) and 0.05-40 U ml(-1) for capacitive system. These immunosensors were applied to analyze CA 125 concentrations in human serum samples and compared with conventional enzyme linked fluorescent assay (ELFA). Both systems showed good agreement with ELFA (P < 0.05). Moreover, these immunosensors were very stable and provided good reproducible responses after regeneration, up to 32 times for SPR and 48 times for capacitive system with relative standard deviation lower than 4%. The SPR immunosensor provided advantages in term of fast response and real-time monitoring while capacitive immunosensor offered a sensitive and cost-effective method for CA 125 detection. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available