4.6 Review

Development of Graphene-based Materials for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

Journal

ACTA PHYSICO-CHIMICA SINICA
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 377-390

Publisher

PEKING UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201709001

Keywords

Lithium sulfur battery; Graphene; Doping; Functionalization; Composites

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0200102, 2016YFB0100100, 2014CB932402]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51525206, 51521091, 51372253, U1401243]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA09010104]
  4. Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KGZD-EW-T06]
  5. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [2015150]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province, China [2015021012]
  7. Institute of Metal Research [2015-PY03]
  8. CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are promising electrochemical energy storage systems because of their high theoretical energy density, natural abundance, and environmental benignity. However, several problems such as the insulating nature of sulfur, high solubility of polysulfides, large volume variation of the sulfur cathode, and safety concerns regarding the lithium anode hinder the commercialization of Li-S batteries. Graphene-based materials, with advantages such as high conductivity and good flexibility, have shown effectiveness in realizing Li-S batteries with high energy density and high stability. These materials can be used as the cathode matrix, separator coating layer, and anode protection layer. In this review, the recent progress of graphene-based materials used in Li-S batteries, including graphene, functionalized graphene, heteroatom-doped graphene, and graphene-based composites, has been summarized. And perspectives regarding the development trend of graphene-based materials for Li-S batteries have been discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available