4.8 Article

Targeted emission reductions from global super-polluting power plant units

Journal

NATURE SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 59-68

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-017-0003-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [41625020]
  2. China's National Basic Research Program [2014CB441301]
  3. National Key RD program [2016YFC0201506]
  4. Collaborative Innovation Center for Regional Environmental Quality
  5. ational Science Foundation of China [41629051]
  6. Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the US Department of Energy, Office of Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are more than 30,000 biomass-and fossil-fuel-burning power plants now operating worldwide, reflecting a tremendously diverse infrastructure, which ranges in capacity from less than a megawatt to more than a gigawatt. In 2010, 68.7% of electricity generated globally came from these power plants, compared with 64.2% in 1990. Although the electricity generated by this infrastructure is vital to economic activity worldwide, it also produces more CO2 and air pollutant emissions than infrastructure from any other industrial sector. Here, we assess fuel-and region-specific opportunities for reducing undesirable air pollutant emissions using a newly developed emission dataset at the level of individual generating units. For example, we find that retiring or installing emission control technologies on units representing 0.8% of the global coal-fired power plant capacity could reduce levels of PM2.5 emissions by 7.7-14.2%. In India and China, retiring coal-fired plants representing 1.8% and 0.8% of total capacity can reduce total PM2.5 emissions from coal-fired plants by 13.2% and 16.0%, respectively. Our results therefore suggest that policies targeting a relatively small number of 'super-polluting' units could substantially reduce pollutant emissions and thus the related impacts on both human health and global climate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available