4.6 Article

Glycosylation and functionality of recombinant β-glucocerebrosidase from various production systems

Journal

BIOSCIENCE REPORTS
Volume 33, Issue -, Pages 771-U272

Publisher

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BSR20130081

Keywords

ERT; Gaucher disease; glycosylation; lysosomal storage disease; macrophage; beta-glucocerebrosidase

Funding

  1. Protalix Biotherapeutics
  2. Office of the Chief Scientist of the Ministry of Industry, Trade and Labour, Israel
  3. Pfizer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The glycosylation of recombinant beta-glucocerebrosidase, and in particular the exposure of mannose residues, has been shown to be a key factor in the success of ERT (enzyme replacement therapy) for the treatment of GD (Gaucher disease). Macrophages, the target cells in GD, internalize beta-glucocerebrosidase through MRs (mannose receptors). Three enzymes are commercially available for the treatment of GD by ERT. Taliglucerase alfa, imiglucerase and velaglucerase alfa are each produced in different cell systems and undergo various post-translational or post-production glycosylation modifications to expose their mannose residues. This is the first study in which the glycosylation profiles of the three enzymes are compared, using the same methodology and the effect on functionality and cellular uptake is evaluated. While the major differences in glycosylation profiles reside in the variation of terminal residues and mannose chain length, the enzymatic activity and stability are not affected by these differences. Furthermore, the cellular uptake and in-cell stability in rat and human macrophages are similar. Finally, in vivo studies to evaluate the uptake into target organs also show similar results for all three enzymes. These results indicate that the variations of glycosylation between the three regulatory-approved beta-glucocerebrosidase enzymes have no effect on their function or distribution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available