4.8 Review

Strategies to Overcome the Limitations of AIEgens in Biomedical Applications

Journal

SMALL METHODS
Volume 2, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smtd.201700392

Keywords

aggregation-induced emission; nanocrystallization; nanomedicine; nonlinear optics; upconversion

Funding

  1. NTU-NHG Innovation Collaboration Grant [M4061202.040]
  2. NTU-A*STAR Silicon Technologies, Centre of Excellence [11235100003]
  3. NEWRI seed funding [NEWRI SF20140901]
  4. School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering at NTU
  5. National Research Foundation [R279-000-444-281, R279-000-483-281]
  6. National University of Singapore [R279-000-482-133]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivated by the demand for high-performance tools for biomedical applications, numerous new luminescent nanomaterials with advanced functionalities are synthesized in recent years. Conventional fluorophores generally suffer from the notorious aggregation-caused quenching effect that deteriorates their practical performance. The recently emerged fluorogens with aggregation-induced emission (AIE) characteristics (AIEgen) have generated a new avenue for biomedical applications due to their unique optical properties, flexible designability, and multifunctional potential. However, the inherent characteristics of AIEgens, including short wavelength absorption, broad emission, and aggregation-dependent brightness indirectly limit their practical performance in the biomedical field. Here, the recent development of AIEgens for biomedical applications is summarized and novel strategies to overcome their limitations are proposed. Furthermore, the strategies and guidelines for the rational design of AIEgens, preparation of water-dispersible AIE nanoparticles, and selection of the excitation/emission methods, which enable AIEgens to be useful in a broader range of biomedical applications, are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available