4.4 Article

A genomic search approach to identify carbonyl reductases in Gluconobacter oxydans for enantioselective reduction of ketones

Journal

BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 78, Issue 8, Pages 1350-1356

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09168451.2014.925775

Keywords

carbonyl reductase; enantioselective reduction; chiral alcohols

Funding

  1. National Key Basic Research Development Program of China [973 Program] [2012CB721003]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [21002029/B020706, 21276084/B060804]
  3. National Major Science and Technology Projects of China [2012ZX09304009]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY13C050004]
  5. Science and Technology Development Foundation of Hangzhou [20101131N05]
  6. Technology Research and Development Program for Institute of Hangzhou [20130432B05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The versatile carbonyl reductases from Gluconobacter oxydans in the enantioselective reduction of ketones to the corresponding alcohols were exploited by genome search approach. All purified enzymes showed activities toward the tested ketoesters with different activities. In the reduction of 4-phenyl-2-butanone with in situ NAD(P)H regeneration system, (S)-alcohol was obtained with an e.e. of up to 100% catalyzed by Gox0644. Under the same experimental condition, all enzymes catalyzed ethyl 4-chloroacetoacetate to give chiral products with an excellent e.e. of up to 99%, except Gox0644. Gox2036 had a strict requirement for NADH as the cofactor and showed excellent enantiospecificity in the synthesis of ethyl (R)-4-chloro-3-hydroxybutanoate. For the reduction of ethyl 2-oxo-4-phenylbutyrate, excellent e.e. (>99%) and high conversion (93.1%) were obtained by Gox0525, whereas the other enzymes showed relatively lower e.e. and conversions. Among them, Gox2036 and Gox0525 showed potentials in the synthesis of chiral alcohols as useful biocatalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available