4.5 Article

Mixotrophic cultivation of microalgae to enhance the quality of lipid for biodiesel application: effects of scale of cultivation and light spectrum on reduction of alpha-linolenic acid

Journal

BIOPROCESS AND BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 531-542

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-017-1888-6

Keywords

Algal biodiesel; Lipid enhancement; PUFA reduction; Bioreactor; Red LED

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi [IFA13-ENG63]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research on microalgal biodiesel is focused not only on getting the highest lipid productivity but also desired quality of lipid. The experiments were initially conducted on flask scale (1L) using acetate carbon source at different concentrations viz. 0.5, 2, 3 and 4 g L-1. The optimum concentration of acetate was considered for further experiments in two airlift photobioreactors (10 L) equipped separately with red and white LED lights. The Feasibility Index (FI) was derived to analyze the scalability of mixotrophic cultivation based on net carbon fixation in biomass per consumption of total organic carbon. The experimental strategy under mixotrophic mode of cultivation lowered the alpha-linolenic acid content of lipid by 60-80% as compared to autotrophic cultivation for Scenedesmus abundans species and yielded the highest biomass and lipid productivities, 59 +/- 2 and 17 +/- 1.8 mg L-1 day(-1), respectively. The TOC, nitrate, and phosphate reduction rates were 74.6 +/- 3.0, 11.5 +/- 1.4, 9.6 +/- 2.4 mg L-1 day(-1), respectively. The significant change was observed in lipid compositions due to the scale, mode of cultivation, and light spectra. As compared to phototrophic cultivation, biodiesel obtained under mixotrophic cultivation only met standard biodiesel properties. The FI data showed that the mixotrophic cultivation was feasible on moderate concentrations of acetate (2-3 g L-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available