4.5 Article

Quantitative, Wide-Spectrum Kinase Profiling in Live Cells for Assessing the Effect of Cellular ATP on Target Engagement

Journal

CELL CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 206-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.10.010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. AbbVie
  2. Bayer Pharma
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim
  4. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  5. Eshelman Institute for Innovation
  6. Genome Canada through Ontario Genomics Institute [OGI-055]
  7. Innovative Medicines Initiative (EU/EFPIA) (ULTRA-DD) [115766]
  8. Janssen
  9. Merck
  10. MSD
  11. Novartis Pharma
  12. Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science (MRIS)
  13. Pfizer
  14. Sao Paulo Research Foundation - FAPESP
  15. Takeda
  16. Wellcome Trust [106169/ZZ14/Z]
  17. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [U24DK116204] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For kinase inhibitors, intracellular target selectivity is fundamental to pharmacological mechanism. Although a number of acellular techniques have been developed to measure kinase binding or enzymatic inhibition, such approaches can fail to accurately predict engagement in cells. Here we report the application of an energy transfer technique that enabled the first broad-spectrum, equilibrium-based approach to quantitatively profile target occupancy and compound affinity in live cells. Using this method, we performed a selectivity profiling for clinically relevant kinase inhibitors against 178 full-length kinases, and a mechanistic interrogation of the potency offsets observed between cellular and biochemical analysis. For the multikinase inhibitor crizotinib, our approach accurately predicted cellular potency and revealed improved target selectivity compared with biochemical measurements. Due to cellular ATP, a number of putative crizotinib targets are unexpectedly disengaged in live cells at a clinically relevant drug dose.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available