4.6 Review

Lepton Number Violation: Seesaw Models and Their Collider Tests

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2018.00040

Keywords

lepton number violation; neutrino mass models; collider physics; seesaw mechanisms; Majorana neutrinos

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-95ER40896]
  2. PITT PACC
  3. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Tera-scale
  4. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
  5. European Union [690575, 674896]
  6. Research Councils UK [ST/G000905/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Majorana nature of neutrinos is strongly motivated from the theoretical and phenomenological point of view. A plethora of neutrino mass models, known collectively as Seesaw models, exist that could generate both a viable neutrino mass spectrum and mixing pattern. They can also lead to rich, new phenomenology, including lepton number non-conservation as well as new particles, that may be observable at collider experiments. It is therefore vital to search for such new phenomena and the mass scale associated with neutrino mass generation at high energy colliders. In this review, we consider a number of representative Seesaw scenarios as phenomenological benchmarks, including the characteristic Type I, II, and III Seesaw mechanisms, their extensions and hybridizations, as well as radiative constructions. We present new and updated predictions for analyses featuring lepton number violation and expected coverage in the theory parameter space at current and future colliders. We emphasize new production and decay channels, their phenomenological relevance and treatment across different facilities in e(+)e(-), e(-)p, and pp collisions, as well as the available Monte Carlo tools available for studying Seesaw partners in collider environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available