4.7 Article

Globalizing Conservation Efforts to Save Species and Enhance Food Production

Journal

BIOSCIENCE
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages 539-545

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biu064

Keywords

agriculture production; biodiversity conservation; conservation conflict; food security; spatial conservation prioritization

Categories

Funding

  1. Brazilian National Council for Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq)
  2. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education (CAPES)
  3. CNPq [304703/2011-7, 479959/2013-7, 407094/2013-0]
  4. Conservation International Brazil
  5. O Boticario Group Foundation for the Protection of Nature [PROG_0008_2013]
  6. European Commission Research and Innovation [1/SAESCTN/ALENT-07-0224-FEDER-001755]
  7. Imperial College London's Grand Challenges in Ecosystems and the Environment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

If the growing needs of humans are to be met, food production must increase; however, increasing food production will further compromise biodiversity. Can this seemingly irreconcilable conflict be mitigated? The solutions proposed so far include reducing food waste and closing yield gaps. Here, we investigate an alternative approach to reducing the impact of agricultural expansion on biodiversity without compromising food production by combining two strategies: taking agricultural production into consideration to solve the biodiversity crisis and promoting the definition of protected areas on the basis of a globalized blueprint. We found that combining these strategies could result in a 78% reduction in the agricultural opportunity costs incurred in the implementation of protected areas. Furthermore, a 30% increase in biodiversity protection could be achieved. We show that the movement toward global governance of natural resources would lead to reduced conflict between the needs of food production and biodiversity conservation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available