4.4 Article

A retrospective study on clinical and radiological outcomes of oral implants in patients followed up for a minimum of 20 years

Journal

CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 199-207

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12571

Keywords

dental implants; implant failure; long-term follow-up; marginal bone loss; multivariate analysis; risk factors

Funding

  1. Oral Health Related Research by Region Skane (Odontologisk Forskning i Region Skane), Sweden [OFRS 414321]
  2. Scientific Research Council of Sweden (Vetenskapsradet) [201502971]
  3. Folktandvarden AB, Region Skane, Sweden
  4. CNPq
  5. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico, Brazil
  6. Oral Health Related Research by Region Skane (Odontologisk Forskning i Region Skane) [OFRS 414321]
  7. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [201318/2012-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundVery long-term follow-up of oral implants is seldom reported in the literature. PurposeTo assess oral implant failure rates and marginal bone loss (MBL) of patients followed up for a minimum of 20 years. Materials and MethodsImplants placed in patients followed up for 20+ years were included. Descriptive statistics, survival analyses, generalized estimating equations were performed. Three-hundred implants were randomly selected for MBL. Results1,045 implants (227 patients) were included. Implant location, irradiation, and bruxism affected the implant survival rate. Thirty-five percent of the failures occurred within the first year after implantation, and another 26.8% in the second/third year. There was a cumulative survival rate of 87.8% after 36 years of follow-up. In the last radiological follow up, 35 implants (11.7%) had bone gain, and 35 implants (11.7%) presented at least 3 mm of MBL. Twenty-six out of 86 failed implants with available radiograms presented severe MBL in the last radiological register before implant failure. ConclusionsMost of the implant failures occurred at the first few years after implantation, regardless of a very long follow up. MBL can be insignificant in long-term observations, but it may, nevertheless, be the cause of secondary failure of oral implants in some cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available