4.7 Article

Transdisciplinary Research, Transformative Learning, and Transformative Science

Journal

BIOSCIENCE
Volume 63, Issue 7, Pages 564-573

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.9

Keywords

biocomplexity; infectious and emerging diseases; interdisciplinary science; public health; ecology

Categories

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation [OCI-0753336, OCI-1135525, HRD-0734825]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology [0832652] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  5. Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (OAC) [1135530, 1135525] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relationship between inter- and transdisciplinary research and potentially transformative science is poorly understood. We use a case study of a long-term transdisciplinary research effort on hantaviruses combined with findings from studies of team science to generate a hypothesized model that links cross-disciplinary collaboration with transformative scientific outcomes. We show that potentially transformative research depends on the existence of an interesting and worthwhile problem to which participants can contribute in salient ways, human and material foundations within disciplines, collaborative mutualism across disciplines, and a transformative learning process that enables knowledge integration across diverse perspectives. Transformative learning theory suggests that new, integrated conceptual understanding is initiated by disorienting dilemmas. We argue that engagement in cross-disciplinary collaboration produces disorienting dilemmas that initiate transformative learning. Our hypothesized model provides a generalized framework for understanding how transformative learning occurs in cross-disciplinary collaboration and how that can lead to transformative science.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available