4.7 Article

Ecosystem Processes and Human Influences Regulate Streamflow Response to Climate Change at Long-Term Ecological Research Sites

Journal

BIOSCIENCE
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages 390-404

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.4.10

Keywords

precipitation/runoff ratio; trend; succession; socioecological systems; Budyko curve

Categories

Funding

  1. US Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Networks of Centres of Excellence-Sustainable Forest Management Network
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology [823293, 1019522, 1027341] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Environmental Biology
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [0823380] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analyses of long-term records at 35 headwater basins in the United States and Canada indicate that climate change effects on streamflow are not as clear as might be expected, perhaps because of ecosystem processes and human influences. Evapotranspiration was higher than was predicted by temperature in water-surplus ecosystems and lower than was predicted in water-deficit ecosystems. Streamflow was correlated with climate variability indices (e.g., the El Nino Southern Oscillation, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, the North Atlantic Oscillation), especially in seasons when vegetation influences are limited. Air temperature increased significantly at 17 of the 19 sites with 20- to 60-year records, but streamflow trends were directly related to climate trends (through changes in ice and snow) at only 7 sites. Past and present human and natural disturbance, vegetation succession, and human water use can mimic, exacerbate, counteract, or mask the effects of climate change on streamflow, even in reference basins. Long-term ecological research sites are ideal places to disentangle these processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available