4.1 Article

Power profiles in multifocal contact lenses with variable multifocal zone

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY
Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages 57-63

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12575

Keywords

contact lenses; lens fitting; power profile; RGP multifocal lenses; variable addition designs

Categories

Funding

  1. 'Formacion de Profesorado Universitario' Grant (Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte) [FPU13/05332]
  2. Conselleria de Educacio, Cultura i Esport de la Generalitat Valenciana [GV/2015/043]
  3. 'Atraccio de talent' research scholarship (Universitat de Valencia) [UV-INV-PREDOC13-110412]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThe power profile of multifocal contact lenses has been demonstrated to report important information that could be used during the fitting process. The aim of this work is to describe the power profile of a recent set of gas permeable multifocal contact lenses as a function of the pupil radius. MethodsThe measured multifocal contact lenses have a centre-distance design, and are available with five distance-vision diameters (XS, S, M, L and XL) and two different additions: Type A (up to +2.00 D) and Type B (up to +2.50 D). The optical device NIMO TR1504 (Lambda-X, Nivelles, Belgium) was used to obtain the power profile measurements. The optical lens power distribution as a function of the aperture radius was described in terms of radial computed colour maps, radial averaged power profiles, addition, and lens portion used for near vision. ResultsThe amount of total addition achieved depends on the diameter of the distance-vision area. That is, the bigger the distance vision area, the bigger the radius of the lens in order to get the same level of addition. In other words, the XS lens provides higher addition values compared to the XL lens design for a given aperture. ConclusionsThe XS and S designs seem to be aimed to favour near vision, whereas the L and XL designs seem to favour distance vision. For this reason, patients who demand good distance vision might benefit from the L or XL designs, and those with high demand on near-vision tasks might benefit from the XS or S designs. The M design could be the best option for those patients who have the same needs for distance and near vision.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available