4.7 Article

Biology Needs a Modern Assessment System for Professional Productivity

Journal

BIOSCIENCE
Volume 61, Issue 8, Pages 619-625

Publisher

AMER INST BIOLOGICAL SCI
DOI: 10.1525/bio.2011.61.8.8

Keywords

academic assessment; systematic biology; scientific productivity; digital objects; curation of natural history collections

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0935231]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology [0935231] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [743783] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stimulated in large part by the advent of the Internet, research productivity in many academic disciplines has changed dramatically over the last two decades. However, the assessment system that governs professional success has not kept pace, creating a mismatch between modes of scholarly productivity and academic assessment criteria. In this article, we describe the problem and present ideas for solutions. We argue that adjusting assessment criteria to correspond to modern scholarly productivity is essential for the success of individual scientists and of our discipline as a whole. The authors and endorsers of this article commit to a number of actions that constitute steps toward ensuring that all forms of scholarly productivity are credited. The emphasis here is on systematic biology, but we are not alone in experiencing this mismatch between productivity and assessment. An additional goal in this article is to begin a conversation about the problem with colleagues in other subdisciplines of biology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available