Journal
BIOSCIENCE
Volume 58, Issue 9, Pages 837-845Publisher
AMER INST BIOLOGICAL SCI
DOI: 10.1641/B580909
Keywords
restoration; conservation; ecosystem services; ecosystem valuation; ecosystem goods
Categories
Funding
- National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
We determined the relative benefits for eight categories of ecosystem goods and services associated with native and restored lands across the conterminous United States. Less than 10% of most native US ecosystems remain, and the proportion that is restored varies widely by biome. Restored lands offer 31% to 93% of native land benefits within a decade after restoration, with restored wetlands providing the most economic value and deserts providing the least. Restored ecosystems that recover rapidly and produce valuable commodities return a higher proportion of total value. The relative values of the benefits provided by restoration vary both by biome and by the ecosystem goods and services of interest. Our analysis confirms that conservation should be the first priority, but that restoration programs across geographic regions can have substantial value. No net loss policies should recognize that restored lands are not necessarily equivalent to native areas with regard to estimated ecosystem benefits.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available