4.7 Article

Roach, Sex, and Gender-Bending Chemicals: The Feminization of Wild Fish in English Rivers

Journal

BIOSCIENCE
Volume 58, Issue 11, Pages 1051-1059

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1641/B581108

Keywords

roach; feminization; intersex; effluents; estrogen

Categories

Funding

  1. Research Councils UK (Natural Environment Research Council and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council)
  2. UK Environment Agency
  3. UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F007787/1, NE/C507661/1, NE/C507688/1, NE/G011133/1, NE/C507702/1, NE/C50767X/1, NE/E017363/1, NE/C507710/1, NER/T/S/2002/00182] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NERC [NE/G011133/1, NE/E017363/1, NE/F007787/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Feminization of the mate roach, Rutilus rutilus, a freshwater, group-spawning fish, is widespread in English rivers; among the causative agents are natural and synthetic steroidal estrogens and chemicals that mimic estrogens. In feminized male roach, concentrations of the egg-yolk protein vitellogenin are elevated, sex steroid hormone dynamics, are altered, and gonad development is disrupted (most notably, a female reproductive duct or developing eggs [oocytes] are present in the testis). In some English rivers containing high levels of estrogens, all male roach sampled have been feminized to varying degrees. in the more severely affected males, individuals produce low-quality sperm with a reduced capability for fertilization. Laboratory studies have shown that the environmental estrogens responsible for inducing gonadal feminization in roach can also alter reproductive behavior, disrupting normal breeding dynamics (parentage) in the zebrafish, another group-spawning fish. Together these findings indicate that feminization of wild roach may result in adverse population-level effects, but this hypothesis has yet to be fully addressed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available