4.8 Article

Physiological and electrochemical effects of different electron acceptors on bacterial anode respiration in bioelectrochemical systems

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages 270-275

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.098

Keywords

Microbial fuel cells; Anaerobic respiration; Shewanella decolorationis; Additional electron acceptors

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB22307]
  2. Team Project of the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong, China [9351007002000001]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation [31200096]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [S2011010004267, S2013010014596]
  5. Guangdong Provincial Programs for Science and Technology Development [2012A061100009]
  6. International Cooperation Projects of Guangdong Province [2011B050400005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To understand the interactions between bacterial electrode respiration and the other ambient bacterial electron acceptor reductions, alternative electron acceptors (nitrate, Fe2O3, fumarate, azo dye MB17) were added singly or multiply into Shewanella decolorationis microbial fuel cells (MFCs). All the added electron acceptors were reduced simultaneously with current generation. Adding nitrate or MB17 resulted in more rapid cell growth, higher flavin concentration and higher biofilm metabolic viability, but lower columbic efficiency (CE) and normalized energy recovery (NER) while the CE and NER were enhanced by Fe2O3 or fumarate. The added electron acceptors also significantly influenced the cyclic voltammetry profile of anode biofilm probably via altering the cytochrome c expression. The highest power density was observed in MFCs added with MB17 due to the electron shuttle role of the naphthols from MB17 reduction. The results provided important information for MFCs applied in practical environments where contains various electron acceptors. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available