4.8 Article

Effects of temperature and nutrient regimes on biomass and lipid production by six oleaginous microalgae in batch culture employing a two-phase cultivation strategy

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages 439-449

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.043

Keywords

Biofuel; Fatty acid; Growth; Microalgae; Stress physiology

Funding

  1. European Regional Development Fund through the INTERREG IVA Programme
  2. Highlands and Islands Enterprise
  3. Crown Estate
  4. Northern Ireland Executive
  5. Scottish Government
  6. Irish Government
  7. NERC [dml010007] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Natural Environment Research Council [dml010007] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Commercial success of algal-based biofuels depends on growth characteristics and lipid metabolism of the production species. The oleaginous microalgae, Thalassiosira pseudonana, Odontella aurita, Nannochloropsis oculata, Isochrysis galbana, Chromulina ochromonoides, and Dunaliella tertiolecta, were cultivated under a matrix of two temperatures (10 and 20 degrees C) and two nutrient regimes (deplete and replete). For all species, a strong negative correlation between growth rate and lipid content was observed. Multiple stressors have no additive effect on lipid accumulation. Total oil content (fatty acid methyl esters, FAMEs, pg cell(-1)) was increased more by nutrient limitation than by temperature stress. In response to nutrient stress, N. oculata emerged as the most robust species with an increase in lipid accumulation of up to three to four-fold compared to the accumulation under nutrient sufficient conditions. Although stress conditions led to reduced fatty acid unsaturation in most taxa due to increased triacylglycerol (TAG) production, a high proportion of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) was maintained in O. aurita. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available