4.4 Article

Motor Clusters Reveal Differences in Risk for Psychosis, Cognitive Functioning, and Thalamocortical Connectivity: Evidence for Vulnerability Subtypes

Journal

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages 721-734

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2167702618773759

Keywords

clinical high risk; psychosis; cluster; movement abnormalities; vulnerability subtypes

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R21MH103231, R21MH110374, R33MH103231, R01MH094650] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R21 MH103231, R33 MH103231, R01 MH094650] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Abnormal development of parallel cortical-striatal networks may contribute to abnormal motor, cognitive, and affective behavior prior to the onset of psychosis. Partitioning individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) using motor behavior may provide a novel perspective on different etiological pathways or patient subtypes. A k-means cluster analysis was conducted in CHR (N = 69; 42% female, mean age = 18.67 years) young adults using theoretically distinct measures of motor behavior. The resulting subtypes were then compared on positive and negative symptoms at baseline, and 2-year risk of psychosis conversion. CHR participants were followed for 2 years to determine conversion to psychosis. CHR subtypes and healthy controls (n = 61; 57% female, mean age = 18.58 years) were compared on multiple cognitive domains and cortical-striatal connectivity. Results suggest 3 vulnerability subtypes of CHR individuals with different profiles of motor performance, symptoms, risk for conversion to psychosis, cognition, and thalamocortical connectivity. This approach may reflect a novel strategy for promoting tailored risk assessment as well as future research developing individualized medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available