4.7 Review

Why Is Eradicating Typhoid Fever So Challenging: Implications for Vaccine and Therapeutic Design

Journal

VACCINES
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines6030045

Keywords

Salmonella Typhi; typhoidal Salmonellae; virulence; typhoid fever; vaccines; healthy carriers; chronic infections

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R03AI135767, R01AI137345, R01AI139625]
  2. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Project [101070]
  3. Cornell President's Council of Cornell Women Affinito-Stewart award
  4. Schwartz Research Fund Award
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI137345, R01AI141514, R01AI139625, R03AI135767] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi) and S. Paratyphi, namely typhoidal Salmonellae, are the cause of (para) typhoid fever, which is a devastating systemic infectious disease in humans. In addition, the spread of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) S. Typhi in many low and middle-income countries poses a significant risk to human health. While currently available typhoid vaccines and therapeutics are efficacious, they have some limitations. One important limitation is the lack of controlling individuals who chronically carry S. Typhi. However, due to the strict host specificity of S. Typhi to humans, S. Typhi research is hampered. As a result, our understanding of S. Typhi pathogenesis is incomplete, thereby delaying the development and improvement of prevention and treatment strategies. Nonetheless, to better combat and contain S. Typhi, it is vital to develop a vaccine and therapy for controlling both acutely and chronically infected individuals. This review discusses how scientists are trying to combat typhoid fever, why it is so challenging to do so, which approaches show promise, and what we know about the pathogenesis of S. Typhi chronic infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available