4.8 Article

Phototrophic cultivation of a thermo-tolerant Desmodesmus sp for lutein production: Effects of nitrate concentration, light intensity and fed-batch operation

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages 435-444

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.064

Keywords

Lutein; Microalgae; Desmodesmus sp.; Nitrate; Light intensity

Funding

  1. Taiwan's National Science Council [NSC 101-2221-E-006-094-MY3, 102-3113-P-006-016, 101-3113-P-110-003]
  2. Headquarters of University Advancement at the National Cheng Kung University
  3. Ministry of Education, Taiwan
  4. Key Science & Technology Specific Project of Fujian Province, China [2010NZ0001-4]
  5. National Marine Commonweal Research Program, China [201205020-2]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [201212G004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Four indigenous thermo-tolerant Desmodesmus sp. strains were examined for their ability to produce lutein. Among them, Desmodesmus sp. F51 was the best strain for this purpose. The medium composition, nitrate concentration and light intensity were manipulated to improve the phototrophic growth and lutein production of Desmodesmus sp. F51. It was found that a nitrogen-sufficient condition was required for lutein accumulation, while a high light intensity enhanced cell growth but caused a decrease in the lutein content. The best cell growth and lutein production occurred when the light intensity and initial nitrate concentration were 600 mu mol/m(2)/s and 8.8 mM, respectively. The fed-batch cultivation strategy was shown to further improve lutein production. The highest lutein productivity (3.56 +/- 0.10 mg/L/d) and content (5.05 +/- 0.20 mg/g) were obtained when pulse-feeding of 2.2 mM nitrate was employed. This study demonstrated the potential of using Desmodesmus sp. F51 as a lutein producer in practical applications. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available