4.4 Article

Annual REE Signal of East Asian Winter Monsoon in Surface Seawater in the Northern South China Sea: Evidence From a Century-Long Porites Coral Record

Journal

PALEOCEANOGRAPHY AND PALEOCLIMATOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 168-178

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017PA003267

Keywords

East Asian winter monsoon; South China Sea; coral; rare earth element; aeolian dust

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91428203, 41603091, 41663001]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB956102]
  3. Bagui Fellowship from Guangxi, China
  4. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [2016GXNSFBA380113]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M612860]
  6. Australian Research Council [DP0773081, LP0989969]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The East Asian winter monsoon (EAWM) plays a significant role in the Asian climate system. However, the scarcity of direct high-resolution records, especially those covering recent centuries, limits our understanding of monsoonal dynamics. Here we present a reconstruction of annual EAWM strength over the past century and a half using a Porites coral from Yongxing Island in the northern South China Sea (SCS), where the variations in the rare earth element (REE) parameters in surface seawater are dominantly controlled by the input of aeolian dust. Our record indicates that the EAWM strength weakly increased overall during the latter half of the nineteenth century but decreased during the twentieth century, especially after similar to 1950 Common Era. Additionally, during the past century and a half, the relationship between the EAWM and the East Asian summer monsoon, as recorded in speleothems, varied temporally and depended on the strength of the EAWM. Our findings suggest that the REE proxy of corals from the offshore SCS can be applied as an excellent indicator of the winter monsoon strength.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available