4.8 Article

Contribution of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and their subfractions to the sludge aggregation in membrane bioreactor coupled with worm reactor

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages 328-336

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.127

Keywords

Membrane bioreactor (MBR); Worm reactor; Extracellular polymeric substances; Sludge aggregation; Extended DLVO theory

Funding

  1. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Management [2013ZX07201007]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology [2011DX01]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20112302110060]
  4. Funds for Creative Research Groups of China [51121062]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focused on the effect of predated sludge recycle on the contribution of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) and their subfractions to sludge aggregation in combined MBR system. It was observed that aggregation abilities of sludge samples were decreased by worm predation. Furthermore, worm predation enhanced the energy barriers and weakened the secondary energy minimum in the interaction energy profiles of slime, loosely bound EPS (LB-EPS) and tightly bound EPS (TB-EPS). Further investigations demonstrated that the content decrease and structural change of different EPS fractions induced by worm predation may be the reason for the decreased aggregation of sludge. Concomitantly, the adsorption tests and atomic force microscopy observation confirmed that the worm predation decreased the adsorption of slime, LB-EPS and TB-EPS on membrane. This would indicate the worm predation could keep an Optimum EPS level for which floc structure was maintained and the fouling propensity of mixed liquid was reduced. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available