4.8 Article

Improving CO2 fixation efficiency by optimizing Chlorella PY-ZU1 culture conditions in sequential bioreactors

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages 321-327

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.122

Keywords

CO2 fixation; Microalgae; Culture optimization; Light intensity; Bioreactors

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51176163]
  2. International Sci. & Tech. Cooperation Program of China [2012DFG61770, 2010DFA72730]
  3. National High Technology R&D Program of China [2012AA050101]
  4. National Key Technology R&D Program of China [2011BAD14B02]
  5. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20110101110021]
  6. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-11-0446]
  7. Key Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [Z1090532]
  8. Science and Technology Project of Guangxi Province [1346011-1]
  9. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to University [B08026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To fix CO2 emissions efficiently from flue gas of coal-fired power plants, the culture medium, light intensity and bioreactors were comprehensively optimized in the process of CO2 fixation by Chlorella PY-ZU1. To make up for relative insufficiency of nutrients (except for the carbon source) resulting from continuous bubbling of 15% CO2, three chemicals were added into the culture to optimize the molar ratios of nitrogen to carbon, phosphorus to carbon, and magnesium to carbon in culture from 0.17 to 0.69, from 0.093 to 0.096, and from 0.018 to 0.030, respectively. Such adjustments led to a 1.25-fold increase in biomass (from 2.41 to 5.42 g L-1). By enhancing light intensity from 4500 to 6000 lux, the peak growth rate of Chlorella PY-ZU1 increased by 99% and reached to 0.95 g L-1 day(-1). Use of a multi-stage sequential bioreactor notably improved the peak CO2 fixation efficiency to 85.6%. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available