3.9 Article

Microscopy cell counting and detection with fully convolutional regression networks

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21681163.2016.1149104

Keywords

Microscopy image analysis; cell counting; cell detection; fully convolutional regression networks; inverting feature representations

Funding

  1. China Oxford Scholarship Fund
  2. Google DeepMind Studentship
  3. EPSRC Programme Grant SeeBiByte [EP/M013774/1]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M013774/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/M013774/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper concerns automated cell counting and detection in microscopy images. The approach we take is to use convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to regress a cell spatial density map across the image. This is applicable to situations where traditional single-cell segmentation-based methods do not work well due to cell clumping or overlaps. We make the following contributions: (i) we develop and compare architectures for two fully convolutional regression networks (FCRNs) for this task; (ii) since the networks are fully convolutional, they can predict a density map for an input image of arbitrary size, and we exploit this to improve efficiency by end-to-end training on image patches; (iii) we show that FCRNs trained entirely on synthetic data are able to give excellent predictions on microscopy images from real biological experiments withoutfine-tuning, and that the performance can be further improved by fine-tuning on these real images. Finally, (iv) by inverting feature representations, we show to what extent the information from an input image has been encoded by feature responses in different layers. We set a new state-of-the-art performance for cell counting on standard synthetic image benchmarks and show that the FCRNs trained entirely with synthetic data can generalise well to real microscopy images both for cell counting and detections for the case of overlapping cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available