4.2 Article

Bayesian data analysis in the phonetic sciences: A tutorial introduction

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHONETICS
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages 147-161

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.07.008

Keywords

Bayesian data analysis; Linear mixed models; Voice onset time; Gender effects; Vowel duration

Funding

  1. NIH [DC02932]
  2. Ohio State University Department of Linguistics Targeted Investment Award
  3. University of Lethbridge
  4. Volkswagen Foundation [89 953]
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [VA 482/8-1]
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS [R56DC002932, R01DC002932] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This tutorial analyzes voice onset time (VOT) data from Dongbei (Northeastern) Mandarin Chinese and North American English to demonstrate how Bayesian linear mixed models can be fit using the programming language Stan via the R package brms. Through this case study, we demonstrate some of the advantages of the Bayesian framework: researchers can (i) flexibly define the underlying process that they believe to have generated the data; (ii) obtain direct information regarding the uncertainty about the parameter that relates the data to the theoretical question being studied; and (iii) incorporate prior knowledge into the analysis. Getting started with Bayesian modeling can be challenging, especially when one is trying to model one's own (often unique) data. It is difficult to see how one can apply general principles described in textbooks to one's own specific research problem. We address this barrier to using Bayesian methods by providing three detailed examples, with source code to allow easy reproducibility. The examples presented are intended to give the reader a flavor of the process of model-fitting; suggestions for further study are also provided. All data and code are available from: https://osf.io/g4zpv. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available