4.8 Article

Thermochemical conversion of raw and defatted algal biomass via hydrothermal liquefaction and slow pyrolysis

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 109, Issue -, Pages 178-187

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.008

Keywords

Algae; Hydrothermal liquefaction; Pyrolysis; Scenedesmus; Spirulina

Funding

  1. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Science to Achieve Results (STAR)
  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Illinois
  3. University of Illinois Research Board
  4. National Science Foundation Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems [CBET-0746453]
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  6. Directorate For Engineering [0746453] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thermochemical conversion is a promising route for recovering energy from algal biomass. Two thermochemical processes, hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL: 300 degrees C and 10-12 MPa) and slow pyrolysis (heated to 450 degrees C at a rate of 50 degrees C/min), were used to produce bio-oils from Scenedesmus (raw and defatted) and Spinilina biomass that were compared against Illinois shale oil. Although both thermochemical conversion routes produced energy dense bio-oil (35-37 MJ/kg) that approached shale oil (41 MJ/kg), bio-oil yields (24-45%) and physico-chemical characteristics were highly influenced by conversion route and feedstock selection. Sharp differences were observed in the mean bio-oil molecular weight (pyrolysis 280-360 Da; HTL 700-1330 Da) and the percentage of low boiling compounds (bp < 400 degrees C) (pyrolysis 62-66%; HTL 45-54%). Analysis of the energy consumption ratio (ECR) also revealed that for wet algal biomass (80% moisture content). HTL is more favorable (ECR 0.44-0.63) than pyrolysis (ECR 0.92-1.24) due to required water volatilization in the latter technique. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available