4.4 Article

Adolescents' Prosocial Behavior Predicts Good Grades Beyond Intelligence and Personality Traits

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages 247-260

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12309

Keywords

Academic achievement; Big Five traits; intelligence; longitudinal study; prosocial behavior

Funding

  1. University of Rome Sapienza
  2. Italian Ministry of Education University and Research (COFIN)
  3. National Institute of Child Health and Development
  4. Spencer Foundation
  5. William T. Grant Foundation
  6. Italian Ministry of Education University and Research (Ateneo)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveResearchers have demonstrated the prediction of academic functioning by children's prosocial behavior (PB). The goal of our study was to examine the contribution of adolescents' PB for middle and senior high school grades after controlling for stability of achievement and for intelligence, Big Five traits, and sociodemographic variables (i.e., sex and socioeconomic status). MethodStudy 1 examined on 165 adolescents (48.5% boys) the prediction by peer-reported PB in 7th grade of academic achievement at the end of junior high school, after controlling for the above variables. Study 2 examined the prediction by 927 (52% girls) 8th graders' PB of academic achievement 5 years later, at the end of senior high school, taking into account the stability of grades, personality traits, and socio-structural variables. ResultsOverall, hierarchical regression analysis indicated in both studies PB and Openness significantly predicted better grades in the short term and over time despite the high stability of grades across 5 years. Extraversion negatively predicted academic achievement across 1 year in junior high school. ConclusionFindings supported the view of PB as a strength and a key resource for adolescents' academic attainment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available