4.8 Article

Chemical properties of biocrude oil from the hydrothermal liquefaction of Spirulina algae, swine manure, and digested anaerobic sludge

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue 17, Pages 8295-8303

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.06.041

Keywords

Hydrothermal liquefaction; Algae; Spirulina; Swine manure; Digested sludge

Funding

  1. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Illinois
  3. National Science Foundation Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems [CBET-0746453]
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [0746453] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the influence of wastewater feedstock composition on hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) biocrude oil properties and physico-chemical characteristics. Spirulina algae, swine manure, and digested sludge were converted under HTL conditions (300 degrees C. 10-12 MPa, and 30 min reaction time). Biocrude yields ranged from 9.4% (digested sludge) to 32.6% (Spirulina). Although similar higher heating values (32.0-34.7 MJ/kg) were estimated for all product oils, more detailed characterization revealed significant differences in biocrude chemistry. Feedstock composition influenced the individual compounds identified as well as the biocrude functional group chemistry. Molecular weights tracked with obdurate carbohydrate content and followed the order of Spirulina < swine manure < digested sludge. A similar trend was observed in boiling point distributions and the long branched aliphatic contents. These findings show the importance of HTL feedstock composition and highlight the need for better understanding of biocrude chemistries when considering bio-oil uses and upgrading requirements. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available