4.8 Article

Effects of physico-chemical parameters on the bacterial and fungal communities during agricultural waste composting

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages 2950-2956

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.089

Keywords

Bacterial community; Fungal community; Composting; PCR-DGGE; Redundancy analysis

Funding

  1. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT0719]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50608029, 50808072, 50978088, 51039001]
  3. Hunan Key Scientific Research Project [2009FJ1010]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [Y5100234]
  5. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [10JJ7005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of this study was to identify and prioritize some of the physico-chemical parameters that contributed to bacterial and fungal community compositions during agricultural waste composting. Relationships between those parameters and microbial community compositions determined by PCR-DGGE were simultaneously evaluated by redundancy analysis (RDA). The results showed that the temporal variation of bacterial community composition was significantly related to water soluble carbon (WSC), ammonium and nitrate (P < 0.05), while the most variation in distribution of fungal community composition was statistically explained by pile temperature, WSC, and moisture content (P < 0.05). Significant amounts of the variation (54.9% and 56.0% for bacterial and fungal species data, respectively) were explained by those parameters, suggesting that those parameters were the most likely ones to influence, or be influenced by the bacterial and fungal species. Variation partitioning analyses indicated that WSC and pile temperature showed predominant effect on the bacterial and fungal community composition, respectively. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available