4.7 Article

Quantum Fragment Based ab Initio Molecular Dynamics for Proteins

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages 5897-5905

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00558

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21433004, 21403068, 21303057]
  2. Shanghai Putuo District [2014-A-02]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20130076120019]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developing ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) methods for practical application in protein dynamics is of significant interest. Due to the large size of biomolecules, applying standard quantum chemical methods to compute energies for dynamic simulation is computationally prohibitive. In this work, a fragment based ab initio molecular dynamics approach is presented for practical application in protein dynamics study. In this approach, the energy and forces of the protein are calculated by a recently developed electrostatically embedded generalized molecular fractionation with conjugate caps (EE-GMFCC) method. For simulation in explicit solvent, mechanical embedding is introduced to treat protein interaction with explicit water molecules. This AIMD approach has been applied to MD simulations of a small benchmark protein Trpcage (with 20 residues and 304 atoms) in both the gas phase and in solution. Comparison to the simulation result using the AMBER force field shows that the AIMD gives a more stable protein structure in the simulation, indicating that quantum chemical energy is more reliable. Importantly, the present fragment-based AIMD simulation captures quantum effects including electrostatic polarization and charge transfer that are missing in standard classical MD simulations. The current approach is linear-scaling, trivially parallel, and applicable to performing the AIMD simulation of proteins with a large size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available