3.8 Article

Pathways to workplace innovation and career satisfaction in the public service The role of leadership and culture

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL ANALYSIS
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 890-914

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IJOA-03-2018-1376

Keywords

Public sector; Innovation; Career satisfaction; Leadership; Engineers; Structural equation modelling

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to study the influence of two climates for innovation constructs, namely, leadership and organisational culture, on workplace innovation and career satisfaction. Design/methodology/approach - This study used structural equation modelling to test the data from 3,125 engineering professionals in the Australian Public Service (APS). Findings - The structural model indicated that leadership for innovation and ambidextrous culture for innovation influenced workplace innovation which, in turn, improved career satisfaction. Moreover, modelling revealed a significant relationship between ambidextrous culture for innovation and career satisfaction. This study also investigated mediation effects and revealed both simple and sequential mediation paths in the model. It was found that improving workplace innovation and career satisfaction through recognition of an engineer's contribution to their agency would assist in retaining and advancing in-house engineering expertise. Practical implications - The structural model could be used to address current shortages of engineering professionals in the Commonwealth of Australia departments. The findings emphasise the importance of Commonwealth departments providing opportunities for their engineers to engage in creative and innovative projects which enhance their professional career. Originality/value - This study fills the gap in the innovation literature by exploring the relationships through which socio-psychological factors affect workplace innovation and career satisfaction on the innovation process for engineering professionals in the APS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available