4.8 Article

Competitive transesterification of soybean oil with mixed methanol/ethanol over heterogeneous catalysts

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 101, Issue 12, Pages 4409-4414

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.099

Keywords

Biodiesel; Methylesters; Ethylesters; Transesterification; Selectivity

Funding

  1. Department of Energy [DE-FG36-05Go85005]
  2. Michigan's 21st Century Job Fund
  3. Michigan
  4. Michigan Corn Growers Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methylesters and ethylesters of fatty acids were synthesized using homogeneous CH3ONa and CH3CH2ONa, anion exchanged resin, and CaO-La2O3 catalysts. Methanol, ethanol, and methanol/ethanol mixtures were used as the alcohol feed for transesterification of soybean oil. With a homogeneous catalyst (CH3ONa) there was essentially no difference in conversion rates between methanolysis and ethanolysis in batch reactions. However, with a heterogeneous resin and CaO-La2O3 catalysts, significant differences in the conversion rates between the methanolysis and ethanolysis were observed. The formation rate of methylesters over a CaO-La2O3 catalyst was higher than that of ethylesters, which may be attributable to a steric hindrance effect. Conversely, with a heterogeneous resin catalyst, the conversion rate of ethylester was higher than that of methylesters which may be attributable to the surface hydrophobicity of the anion exchanged resin. When the transesterification of soybean oil was carried out with an equimolar methanol/ethanol mixture, the yield ratio of methylester to ethylester formed within the first 30 min was 2.6 for the homogeneous catalyst (0.3% CH3ONa), and 3.4 for the heterogeneous CaO-La(2)O(3)catalyst. These differences in selectivity are likely due to both the higher reactivity of methoxide and to a steric hindrance effect of ethoxide on the catalyst surface. In addition, the transformation of methylester to ethylester was observed when a methanol/ethanol mixture was used. Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available