4.8 Article

Qualitative and quantitative assessment of microbial community in batch anaerobic digestion of secondary sludge

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 101, Issue 24, Pages 9461-9470

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.081

Keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis; Non-metric multidimensional scaling; Real-time PCR; Secondary sludge

Funding

  1. Korea Ministry of Environment
  2. Korea Ministry of Knowledge and Economy
  3. Korea Research Foundation
  4. Korean Government (MOEHRD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbial community shifts were determined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and real-time PCR for an anaerobic batch digester treating secondary sludge. The batch process was successfully operated with an organic removal efficiency of 35% associated with a 91% decrease in the bacterial 16S rRNA gene concentration. The microbial community structures showed continuous shifts within four bacterial phyla and three archaeal orders. Several bacterial species, such as Fusibacter-related, Clostridium-like, and Syntrophus-like organisms, appeared to be responsible for acidogenesis or syntrophic acid degradation. Both hydrogenotrophic and aceticlastic methanogens appear to have been involved in the methanogenesis with the acidogenic products. The quantitative structure of the methanogenic populations varied continuously, with the growth of Methanomicrobiales and Methanosarcinales in series, to result in a Methanomicrobiales-dominant population. The ordination of microbial community structures demonstrated that the quantitative methanogenic structure converged to the seed inoculum while the bacterial and archaeal DGGE band patterns diverged. These results provide an insight into the microbial behavior in the transitional phase (e.g., a start-up period) of anaerobic sludge digestion. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available