4.1 Article

Biotic effects during the settlement process of non-indigenous species in marine benthic communities

Journal

AQUATIC INVASIONS
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 247-259

Publisher

REGIONAL EURO-ASIAN BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS CENTRE-REABIC
DOI: 10.3391/ai.2018.13.2.06

Keywords

Madeira Island; fouling communities; marina environment; biotic interactions; invasion process

Funding

  1. ARDITI - Regional Agency for Development and Technology [M1420-09-5369-000001]
  2. ARDITI Grant Programme Madeira 14-20 [002458/2015/132]
  3. Project Observatorio Oceanico da Madeira-OOM [M1420-01-0145-FEDER-000001]
  4. Madeira Regional Operational Programme (Madeira 14-20) through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  5. FCT Investigator Programme [IF/01606/2014/CP1230/CT0001]
  6. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT) [UID/MAR/04292/2013]
  7. project MIMAR INTERREG MAC Programme [MAC/4.6.d/066]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biotic interactions, particularly predation/grazing and competition, are key factors limiting the introduction success of nonindigenous species (NIS). In addition, positive interactions are considered important drivers of community structure, and both positive and negative interactions between native and NIS can determine the ability of communities to resist MS invasions. This study was conducted in Madeira Island (NE Atlantic) to evaluate how predation and facilitation will affect settlement success of NIS. We manipulated the access of predators to bare and partially pre-invaded PVC settling plates to later be exposed to high propagule pressure of NIS in a marina environment. Results indicate that NIS diversity was greater in pre-invaded treatments, but only on those plates exposed to predators. Our findings suggest that positive interactions between established MS and incoming settlers may promote the establishment success of newcomer NIS under predation pressure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available