4.1 Article

PLATELET-TO-LYMPHOCYTE RATIO AND NEUTROPHIL-TO-LYMPHOCYTE RATIO PREDICT MUCOSAL DISEASE SEVERITY IN ULCERATIVE COLITIS

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 155-162

Publisher

DE GRUYTER POLAND SP ZOO
DOI: 10.1515/jomb-2017-0050

Keywords

mucosal disease; neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; platelet to lymphocyte ratio; ulcerative colitis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We investigated the sensitivity of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), as well as a combination of NLR and PLR to predict endoscopic disease severity based on mucosal assessment in ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: The study group consisted 104 patients with active UC, 104 patients in remission, and 105 healthy individuals. Disease activity was described with Rachmilewitz endoscopic activity index (EAI). Curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff values of NLR and PLR for obtaining remission. The patients with both PLR and NLR values higher than the cutoff values were coded as high risk, those with one parameter higher were coded as moderate risk, those with both parameters lower than the cutoff values were coded as low-risk patients. Results: The mean NLR and PLR values in the endoscopically active disease group were higher than the others, with higher values in the endoscopic remission group compared with the control group (p<0.001). Rachmilewitz EAI in high-risk patients was significantly higher than that in others (p<0.001). In Cox regression analyses, moderate and high risk, high erythrocyte sedimentation rate and high EAI were found as independent predictors of endoscopic active disease. Conclusions: This is the first study that investigated the use of NLR and PLR combination to assess endoscopic disease severity in UC. Either high NLR or PLR levels can predict active endoscopic disease. However, the use of these parameters in combination is more accurate in evaluating mucosal disease and inflammation in UC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available