4.2 Article

Re-assessing abundance of Southern Hudson Bay polar bears by aerial survey: effects of climate change at the southern edge of the range

Journal

ARCTIC SCIENCE
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 634-655

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/as-2018-0004

Keywords

abundance estimation; aerial survey; mark-recapture distance-sampling; polar bear; Southern Hudson Bay

Funding

  1. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
  2. Quebec Ministere des Forets, de la Faune et des Parcs
  3. Makivik Corporation
  4. Environment and Climate Change Canada
  5. Cree Outfitters and Trappers Association
  6. Nunavik Marine Region Wildlife Board
  7. Nunavut Department of Environment
  8. Nunavut Wildlife Management Board
  9. Polar Bears International
  10. World Wildlife Fund Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Southern Hudson Bay polar bear (Ursus maritimus Phipps, 1774) subpopulation is considered stable, but conflicting evidence lends uncertainty to that designation. Capture-recapture studies conducted in 1984-1986 and 2003-2005 and an aerial survey conducted in 2011/2012 suggested that abundance was likely unchanged since the mid-1980s. However, body condition and body size declined since then, and duration of sea ice decreased by about 30 days. Due to the conflicting information on subpopulation status and ongoing changes in sea ice, we conducted another aerial survey in 2016 to determine whether abundance had changed. We collected data via mark-recapture distance sampling and double-observer protocols. Results suggest that abundance declined 17% from 943 bears (95% CI: 658-1350) in 2011/2012 to 780 (95% CI: 590-1029) in 2016. The proportion of yearlings declined from 12% of the population in 2011 to 5% in 2016, whereas the proportion of cubs remained similar (16% in 2011 vs. 19% in 2016) suggesting low survival of the 2015 cohort. In a warming Arctic, duration of sea ice is predicted to continue to decline in Hudson Bay affecting all ice-dependent wildlife; therefore, further monitoring of this subpopulation is warranted. We recommend a conservative approach to harvest management and repeating the aerial survey in 2021.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available