4.8 Article

The fate of di-n-butyl phthalate in a laboratory-scale anaerobic/anoxic/oxic wastewater treatment process

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 101, Issue 20, Pages 7767-7772

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.028

Keywords

Anaerobic-anoxic-oxic system; Di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP); Kinetic; Biodegradation; Waste treatment

Funding

  1. Guangdong Provincial Department of Science and Technology [2008 2008A080800003, 2003A30406]
  2. Science and Technology Foundation of Guangzhou city [2004Z3-D0271]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A laboratory-scale anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (AAO) wastewater treatment system was employed to investigate the effects of hydraulic retention time (HRT) and sludge retention time (SRT) on the removal and fate of di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP). HRT had no significant effect on DNBP removal between 12 and 30 h. However, longer HRT increased DnBP accumulation in the system and DnBP retention in the waste sludge. When SRT was increased from 15 to 25 d, DnBP removal efficiency stayed above 95%. Compared to the removal of only 90% at SRT of 10 d, longer SRT enhanced DnBP degradation efficiency. The optimal HRT and SRT for both nutrients and DnBP removal were 18 h and 15 d. At these retention times, about 72.66% of DnBP was degraded by the activated sludge process, 2.44% was released in the effluent, 24.44% was accumulated in the system, and 0.5% remained in the waste sludge. The anaerobic, anoxic and oxic reactors were responsible for 17.14%, 15.02% and 63.46% of the overall DnBP removal, respectively. Meanwhile a removal degradation model was formulated, and kinetic parameters were evaluated with batch experiments under anaerobic, anoxic, oxic conditions. The model can well forecast the effluent quality of anaerobic/anoxic/oxic reactors of the AAO process. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available