4.7 Review

Advanced chemical strategies for lithium-sulfur batteries: A review

Journal

GREEN ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 2-19

Publisher

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gee.2017.08.002

Keywords

Lithium-sulfur batteries; Chemical reaction; Lithium polysulfides; Functional groups; Additives

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21303038]
  2. Open Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Resource Utilization [RERU2016004]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry
  4. One Hundred Talents Program of Anhui Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) battery has been considered as one of the most promising rechargeable batteries among various energy storage devices owing to the attractive ultrahigh theoretical capacity and low cost. However, the performance of Li-S batteries is still far from theoretical prediction because of the inherent insulation of sulfur, shuttling of soluble polysulfides, swelling of cathode volume and the formation of lithium dendrites. Significant efforts have been made to trap polysulfides via physical strategies using carbon based materials, but the interactions between polysulfides and carbon are so weak that the device performance is limited. Chemical strategies provide the relatively complemented routes for improving the batteries' electrochemical properties by introducing strong interactions between functional groups and lithium polysulfides. Therefore, this review mainly discusses the recent advances in chemical absorption for improving the performance of Li-S batteries by introducing functional groups (oxygen, nitrogen, and boron, etc.) and chemical additives (metal, polymers, etc.) to the carbon structures, and how these foreign guests immobilize the dissolved polysulfides. (C) 2017, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available