3.8 Review

Nailfold Capillaroscopy Within and Beyond the Scope of Connective Tissue Diseases

Journal

CURRENT RHEUMATOLOGY REVIEWS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 12-21

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1573397113666170615093600

Keywords

Nailfold capillaroscopy; Raynaud's phenomenon; systemic sclerosis; connective tissue disease; rheumatic-like conditions; diabetic stiff-hand syndrome

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Nailfold capillaroscopy is a noninvasive instrumental method for morphological analysis of the nutritive capillaries in the nailfold area. In rheumatology, it is a method of choice among instrumental modalities for differential diagnosis between primary and secondary Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) in systemic rheumatic diseases. RP is a common diagnostic problem in rheumatology. Defining the proper diagnosis is a prerequisite for administration of the appropriate treatment. Thus, nailfold capillaroscopic examination is of crucial importance for the every-day practice of the rheumatologists and is currently gaining increasing attention. The most specific capillaroscopic changes are observed in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). Due to the high prevalence of the capillaroscopic changes in this clinical entity and their early appearance, they could be used for early and very early diagnosis of the disease. More recently, scleroderma type capillaroscopic changes have been defined as diagnostic criterion in the new EULAR/ ACR classification criteria for SSc together with the presence of scleroderma-related autoantibodies, RP, telangiectasia and other clinical signs. Capillaroscopic changes in other connective tissue diseases and in different rheumatic-like conditions like those in diabetes mellitus (e.g., diabetic stiff-hand syndrome) and paraneoplastic syndromes associated with microvascular pathology should be interpreted properly in order to obtain precise diagnosis in the shortest possible differential diagnostic process..

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available