4.3 Review

Lupus community panel proposals for optimising clinical trials: 2018

Journal

LUPUS SCIENCE & MEDICINE
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2018-000258

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
  2. GSK group of companies
  3. Xencor
  4. Office of Minority Health
  5. Celgene
  6. Janssen
  7. Biogen
  8. Gilead
  9. BMS
  10. AstraZeneca
  11. HGS/GSK
  12. Amgen
  13. MRC [MR/M01665X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Formidable impediments stand in the way of treatment development for lupus. These include the unwieldy size of current trials, international competition for scarce patients, complex outcome measures and a poor understanding of these outcomes in the world at large. The heterogeneity of the disease itself coupled to superimposition of variegated background polypharmacy has created enough immunological noise to virtually ensure the failure of lupus treatment trials, leaving an understandable suspicion that at least some of the results in testing failed drugs over the years may not have been negative, but merely uninterpretable. The authors have consulted with many clinical trial investigators, biopharmaceutical developers and stakeholders from government and voluntary sectors. This paper examines the available evidence that supports workable trial designs and proposes approaches to improve the odds of completing interpretable treatment development programs for lupus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available