4.7 Article

Accelerating wavefunction in density-functional-theory embedding by truncating the active basis set

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 143, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.4923367

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/K018965/1, EP/J012742/1]
  2. National Science Foundation CAREER Award [CHE-1057112]
  3. EPSRC [EP/K018965/1, EP/J012742/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1254393, EP/J012742/1, EP/K018965/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Division Of Chemistry
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1057112] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methods where an accurate wavefunction is embedded in a density-functional description of the surrounding environment have recently been simplified through the use of a projection operator to ensure orthogonality of orbital subspaces. Projector embedding already offers significant performance gains over conventional post-Hartree-Fock methods by reducing the number of correlated occupied orbitals. However, in our first applications of the method, we used the atomic-orbital basis for the full system, even for the correlated wavefunction calculation in a small, active subsystem. Here, we further develop our method for truncating the atomic-orbital basis to include only functions within or close to the active subsystem. The number of atomic orbitals in a calculation on a fixed active subsystem becomes asymptotically independent of the size of the environment, producing the required O(N-0) scaling of cost of the calculation in the active subsystem, and accuracy is controlled by a single parameter. The applicability of this approach is demonstrated for the embedded many-body expansion of binding energies of water hexamers and calculation of reaction barriers of SN2 substitution of fluorine by chlorine in alpha-fluoroalkanes. (C) 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available