4.8 Article

Optimization of cellulase mixture for efficient hydrolysis of steam-exploded corn stover by statistically designed experiments

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 100, Issue 2, Pages 819-825

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.06.068

Keywords

Cellulase mixture; Optimization; Steam-exploded corn stover; Statistically designed experiments; Bioethanol

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program (973 Program) [2007CB714306]
  2. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B505]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To improve the enzymatic hydrolytic efficiency and reduce production cost, a statistically designed experimental approach was used to optimize the composition of cellulase mixture so as to maximize the amount of glucose produced from steam-exploded corn stover (SECS). Using seven purified enzymes (cellobiohydrolases, Cel7A, Cel6A,Cel6B: endoglucanases, Cel7B, Cel12A, Cel61A; and beta-glucosidase) from Trichoderma viride T 100-14 mutant strain, a multi-enzyme mixture was constituted after screening and optimization. The final optimal composition (mol%) of the multi-enzyme mixture was Cel7A (19.8%), Cel6A (37.5%), Cel6B (4.7%), Cel7B (17.7%), Cel12A (15.2%), Cel61A (2.3%) and beta-glucosidase (2.8%). The subsequent verification experiments followed by glucose assay together with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation confirmed the validity of the models. The multi-enzyme mixture displayed a high performance in converting the cellulosic substrate (SECS). The amount of glucose produced (15.5 mg/ml) was 2.1 times as that of the crude cellulase preparation. The results indicated that the optimized cellulase mixture is an available and efficient paradigm for the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrate. The enhanced cellulolytic activity displayed by the constructed cellulase mixture could be used as an effective tool for producing bioethanol efficiently from cellulose. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available