4.5 Article

Quick Response in Supply Chains with Stochastically Risk Sensitive Retailers

Journal

DECISION SCIENCES
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages 932-957

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/deci.12303

Keywords

Contracts; Quick response; Risk analysis; Risk preference; Risk sensitivity; Supply chain management

Categories

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [PolyU5421-12H]
  2. Hong Kong Polytechnic University under the Fung Yiu King-Wing Hang Bank Endowed Professorship
  3. Hong Kong Polytechnic University
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71601176]
  5. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2017T100463]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quick response is a supply chain practice that can help improve operations by responding quickly to market changes. In particular, when retailers are perfectly rational and risk neutral, quick response is known to be a highly beneficial strategy to the retailers. However, in practice, retailers may possess different kinds of unstable risk preferences, which include risk-averse and risk-seeking attitudes. Thus, retailers may be stochastically risk sensitive. In this article, we consider all these factors simultaneously and explore how the retailer's stochastic risk preference affects the values of quick response to the supply chain and its members. Among various findings, we show that quick response is always beneficial to the supply chain when the retailer is stochastically risk sensitive. In most cases, we demonstrate that if the retailer is more risk averse (risk seeking) stochastically, the retailer is benefited more, whereas the manufacturer suffers a smaller profit loss (a bigger profit loss), under quick response. We prove that different commonly used supply chain contracts can achieve robust Pareto improvement in the supply chain. We also uncover that if the manufacturer ignores the retailer's stochastic risk preference, the achievability of Pareto improvement by contracts will be negatively affected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available