4.8 Article

Structural characterization and in vitro antitumor activity of a novel polysaccharide isolated from the fruiting bodies of Pleurotus ostreatus

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 100, Issue 4, Pages 1682-1686

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.004

Keywords

Pleurotus ostreatus; Polysaccharide; Structure characterization; Antitumor activity

Funding

  1. national key technology RD [2007BA138B02]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of PR China
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province [20060413-4, 20080906]
  4. Excellent Youth Foundation of Jilin City [200704)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel water-soluble polysaccharide (POPS-1) was obtained from the fruiting bodies of Pleurotus ostreatus by hot water extraction, ethanol precipitation, and fractionated by DEAE-cellulose ion exchange chromatography and sepharose CL-6B gel filtration chromatography using an ATKA explore 100 purifier. The structure characterization and antitumor activity of the POPS-I were evaluated in this paper. According to GC analysis, HPGPC, FT-IR, partial acid hydrolysis, periodate oxidation and Smith degradation, methylation and GC-MS analysis, the results indicate POPS-1 (M-w = 31 kDa) was composed of Man; Gal; Glc with a molar ratio of 1:2.1:7.9, it had a backbone of beta-(1 -> 3)-linked glucose residues, which occasionally branches at O-6. The branches were composed of (1 -> 3)-linked Glc, (1 -> 4)-linked Gal, (1 -> 4)-linked Man, and terminated with Glc and Gal residues. Cytotoxicity assay showed POPS-1 presented significantly higher antitumor activity against Hela tumor cell in vitro, in a dose-dependent manner, and exhibited significantly lower cytotoxicity, to human embryo kidney 293T cells than Hela tumor cells compared with 5-Fu. The results suggest POPS-1 may be considered as a potential candidate for developing a novel low toxicity antitumor agent. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available