4.8 Article

Application of the OECD 301F respirometric test for the biodegradability assessment of various potential endocrine disrupting chemicals

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 99, Issue 9, Pages 3458-3467

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.08.002

Keywords

biodegradation kinetics; respirometry; wastewater; activated sludge; EDCs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The biodegradability of several potential endocrine disrupting compounds, namely 4-n-nonylphenol (4-n-NP), nonylphenol monoethoxylate (NP1EO), nonylphenol diethoxylate (NP2EO), bisphenol A (BPA), triclosan (TCS), di-(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate (DEHP), perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorononanoate (PFNA) was evaluated in this study, using OECD method 301F (manometric respirometry test) and activated sludge as inoculum. According to the results, 4-n-NP and BPA meet the strict definition of ready biodegradability and they are not expected to be persistent during the activated sludge process. Partial biodegradation was observed for DEHP (58.7 +/- 5.7%, n = 3). TCS (52.1 +/- 8.5%, n = 3) and NP1EO (25.9 +/- 8.1%, n = 3), indicating their possible biodegradation in wastewater treatment systems, while no biodegradation was observed for NP2EO, PFOA and PFNA. Experiments in the co-presence of a readily biodegradable compound showed the absence of co-metabolic phenomena during 4-n-NP, BPA and TCS biodegradation. Using first order kinetics to describe biodegradation of the target compounds, half-lives of 4.3 +/- 0.6, 1.3 +/- 0.2, 1.8 +/- 0.5, 6.9 +/- 2.6 days were calculated for 4-n-NP, BPA, TCS and DEHP, respectively. Toxicity tests using marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri showed that biodegradation of 4-n-NP, NP1EO, BPA and TCS is a simultaneous detoxification process, while possible abiotic or biotic transformations of NP2EO, DEHP, PFOA and PFNA during respirometric test resulted to significant increase of their toxicities. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available