4.2 Review

Protein- and Peptide-Modified Synthetic Polymeric Biomaterials

Journal

BIOPOLYMERS
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages 32-48

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bip.21333

Keywords

bio-hybrid; protein; peptide; biomaterials; hydrogel; assembly

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DGE-0221651, DMR-0239744, EPS-0447610]
  2. National Institutes of Health [1-RO1-EB006006-01, 1-P20-RR017716]
  3. US Department of Commerce [70NANB7H6178]
  4. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P20RR017716] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [R01EB006006] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review presents all overview oil bio-hybrid approaches of integrating the structural and functional features of proteins and peptides with synthetic polymers and the resulting unique properties in such hybrids, with a focus oil bioresponsive/bioactive systems with biomaterials applications. The review is divided in two broad sections. First, we describe several examples of bio-hybrids produced by combining versatile synthetic polymers with proteins/enzymes and drugs that have resulted in (1) hybrid materials based oil responsive polymers, (2) responsive hydrogels based oil enzyme-catalyzed reactions, protein-protein interactions and protein-drug sensing, and (3) dynamic hydrogels based oil conformational changes of a protein. Next, we present hybrids produced by combining synthetic polymers with peptides, classified based oil the properties of the peptide domain: (1) peptides with different conformations, such as alpha-helical coiled-coil, and beta-sheet; (2) peptides derived from structural protein domains such as silk, elastin, titin, and collagen; and (3) peptides with other biofunctional properties such as cell-binding domains and enzyme-recognized degradation domains. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers (Pept Sci) 94: 32-48, 2010.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available