4.6 Article

Development of a machine learning potential for graphene

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.054303

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP) / ERC [616121]
  2. Royal Society through a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award
  3. EPSRC [EP/P020194/1, EP/P022561/1]
  4. EPSRC [EP/P022596/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P022596/1, EP/P020194/1, 1782307, EP/P022561/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present an accurate interatomic potential for graphene, constructed using the Gaussian approximation potential (GAP) machine learning methodology. This GAP model obtains a faithful representation of a density functional theory (DFT) potential energy surface, facilitating highly accurate (approaching the accuracy of ab initio methods) molecular dynamics simulations. This is achieved at a computational cost which is orders of magnitude lower than that of comparable calculations which directly invoke electronic structure methods. We evaluate the accuracy of our machine learning model alongside that of a number of popular empirical and bond-order potentials, using both experimental and ab initio data as references. We find that whilst significant discrepancies exist between the empirical interatomic potentials and the reference data-and amongst the empirical potentials themselves-the machine learning model introduced here provides exemplary performance in all of the tested areas. The calculated properties include: graphene phonon dispersion curves at 0 K (which we predict with sub-meV accuracy), phonon spectra at finite temperature, in-plane thermal expansion up to 2500 K as compared to NPT ab initio molecular dynamics simulations and a comparison of the thermally induced dispersion of graphene Raman bands to experimental observations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available